

A trapezoidal (IBR-class) roofing sheet line continuously forms angular trapezoid ribs from coil for roof or wall cladding. The logical shop flow is stable across vendors: uncoil → guide/feed → multi-pass roll forming → hydraulic cut-to-length → exit. Profile tooling, frame type (mid-plate vs guide-post vs gantry), and power tier change with the named quotation — the flowchart stays the same; the numbers do not.
Guide-post structural hosts and mid-plate hosts share this logic but differ in frame and shaft sizing — confirm on the proposal drawing.
| Source quote label | Thickness | Speed | Main / hyd | Shaft / notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-config roofing sheet | ~0.3–0.9 mm | ~12 m/min | ~7.5 / ~4.5 kW | Shaft ~φ85; envelope ~8500×1650×1500 mm; Delta PLC class |
| 7.5 kW class | ~0.2–0.8 mm | ~18–20 m/min | ~7.5 / ~4.5 kW | Shaft ~φ85; mid-plate ~16–18 mm |
| 11 kW class | ~0.2–1.0 mm | ~20–25 m/min | ~11 / ~4.5 kW | Shaft ~φ90; mid-plate ~20–22 mm |
Conflict call-out: do not average these three quotes into one thickness/speed/power band. Guide-post trapezoid and gantry/majestic profile quotes are other configurations — answer by named file, not a blended “standard trapezoid” number.
Industry context pages often advertise ~10–15 m/min or up to ~20 m/min with ~14–26 stations — use only as market background beside the named ZTRFM quote.
Station order is the same. Drainage and rib height come from the profile drawing; do not invent a second flowchart.
Both appear in industry lines. The named quotation’s cutter description wins; do not assume flying cut from a high m/min marketing number alone.
No. Keep each quote’s thickness, speed, kW, and shaft as one row.
Final ratings follow the named proposal. Price and lead time are out of scope.