

An economic silo corrugated panel line roll-forms prefabricated steel grain-silo / bolted-tank wall panels: decoil, calibrate, form corrugation, punch bolt holes (transverse bank + servo move), then cut to length. A separate curving unit can roll the finished panel to the silo radius when required.
Industry silo-panel guides start from the finished panel drawing (profile, holes, diameter) — the same selection discipline applies here. Not a greenhouse channel line and not a grape-trellis mill.
| Item | Reference |
|---|---|
| Speed | ~15 m/min |
| Main / hydraulic | ~30 kW / ~15 kW (with accumulator); hyd pressure ~25 MPa |
| Stands / shaft | ~18 roller groups (profile-dependent); shaft ~φ140 (45# QT); rollers GCr15 |
| Drive / control | Cast-stand gearbox; industrial PC + PLC + inverter |
| Panel / material | ~1200 mm × (2–3) mm; yield ≤300 MPa |
| Punch / cut | Transverse stop bank punch; longitudinal servo one-hole moves; post-form die cut (front cut optional) |
| Variant | Notes |
|---|---|
| 68×13 heavy | Strip ~1.8–3.3 mm; form ≤~10 m/min; total ~190 kW — never publish as the economic-only answer |
| HY1250 arc type | ~0.7–1.5 mm; ~3 m/min; main servo ~11 kW; hyd ~5.5 kW; ~18 passes + 3-axis crowning; shaft ~φ105 |
| Wall-panel update note | ~0.95–1.2 mm; feed ~1200 mm; main servo ~15 kW; ~10 stands; ~2 pcs/min (length ref. ~2400 mm) |
Market silo lines often advertise 5–25 m/min and wide thickness bands — use them only as industry context; keep economic vs heavy ratings side by side on the proposal.
Optional curving unit (ref.): ~2000×1200×1900 mm; drive ~5.5 kW; lift ~2.2 kW (~5 t); 3-roll; panel ~2–3 mm. It is not a substitute for host speed or main-motor power — publish curving cycle separately when the project needs arc panels.
No. Curving is an auxiliary; host speed and kW stay on the forming line.
No. That band belongs to the 68×13 heavy variant.
No — different product family and parameter set.
Corrugation pitch, bolt pattern, and silo diameter drive tooling and punch layout. Generic “silo machine” labels hide those differences.
Final ratings follow the named proposal. Price and lead time are out of scope.