

Cut-off type is a configuration choice on the same C / Z / U purlin product family. It affects achievable production speed, noise, blade change practice, and auxiliary motors. One shear variant is not the only public standard.
| Variant | How it works | What changes on the quote |
|---|---|---|
| Stop-cut / hydraulic cut-to-length | Line stops or slows; hydraulic shear cuts the formed section | Common on standard Automatic-class packages; simpler mechanics, throughput limited by stop/start |
| Flying shear / flying saw | Cut carriage synchronizes with the moving profile (non-stop or near-continuous) | Higher speed tiers; adds saw/shear motor power — e.g. flying-saw motor about 15 kW on some C/U references |
| Twist-break (twist shear) | Hydraulic twist-style cut on the formed purlin; tight blade spacing for clean ends on some heavy/structural packages | Alternate cut package; size changes may require blade attention unless an “infinite” companion shear is fitted |
Industry literature also separates pre-cut (flat strip before the mill) from post-cut (after forming). Pre-cut can share one flat blade across sizes; post-cut favors end geometry. Flying systems are usually post-cut implementations.
Compare production speed only when punch method and shear type match. A flying-shear tier is not interchangeable with a stop-cut tier without re-quoting. Example: gearbox + flying-saw packages on C or U lines may cite about 30 m/min, while flying-shear U references sit around 8–10 m/min — different packages.
Z-purlin packages document both front (pre) shear and rear stop-cut layouts. State which is quoted. Some lines carry both pre-cut and post-cut stations for threading and final length.
Not always. For moderate cut frequency and long lengths, stop-cut can be simpler and sufficient. Flying systems pay off when cuts/hour and continuous speed dominate.
No. Twist-break is a distinct cut mechanism; flying saw is a synchronized moving cut. Ask for the named package.
No — they are configuration variants on the same C/Z/U family, confirmed in the technical proposal.
Pre-cut favors multi-size flat-blade sharing; post-cut favors formed-end geometry. Flying systems are usually post-cut. Match the drawing and mix of sizes.
Final ratings follow the confirmed technical proposal for the named cut package. Price and lead time are out of scope.