- Tuo AI
- Live
- My Account
- Shopping Cart
- Inquiry Basket
- Contact Us
- Back to Top
Punched Scaffold Plank Line vs Standard C225 Walking Board Line
Table of Contents
- Definition
- Side-by-side comparison
- Reference parameters
- Boundaries and conflicts
- Market product note
- Buyer FAQ
- References
1. Definition
Buyers often ask whether a punched + tracking-cut plank line and a standard C225 / YX38-225 walking-board line are interchangeable. They are not. Both make steel scaffold planks, but punch density, cut mode, power split, and typical speed bands differ enough that proposal sheets must stay separate.
2. Side-by-side comparison
| Topic | C225 / YX38-225 family | Punched + tracking (GY160 class) |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Standard walking board / scaffolding panel | Continuous punched walking board |
| Speed | About 5–10 m/min (some EN 6–10) | About 1–6 m/min |
| Punch | Stretch / pattern holes as drawn | Continuous press punch emphasized |
| Cut | Hydraulic cut-to-length | Hydraulic tracking cut |
| Power story | Main ~22 kW / hyd ~5.5 kW | Form ~22 + punch ~11 + total ~45 kW |
| Section sketch | Width ~225; height 38 / 60 / 63 class | Width ~230 × height ~65 class |
| Stands | ~18 / φ80 recommended | ~16; φ70/φ80 coexist |
3. Reference parameters
Use the equipment pages for full tables. Quick selection cues:
- Need dense continuous punching + flying cut → punched / tracking configuration.
- Need the recommended C225 family sheet with stretch-hole punch and stop/hydraulic cut → C225 configuration.
- Need multi-profile hanging frames → third path (hanging), not “punched vs plain” alone.
4. Boundaries and conflicts
- Never merge the 1–6 and 5–10 speed tables into one datasheet.
- C225 English quotes sometimes list Main 44 kW with host 15 kW — conflict vs CN 22 kW; do not treat either as sole truth without naming the sheet.
- Press tonnage variants on punched lines (110T / 125T) must not be forced into one number.
- Hanging multi-profile is a separate decision axis from perforated vs embossed product style.
5. Market product note
Industry articles contrast perforated (hole-based grip/drainage) vs embossed (texture rollers) plank products. That product choice drives whether the plant needs a heavy punch press or emboss tooling — it is complementary context, not a substitute for the C225 vs GY160 equipment comparison above.
6. Buyer FAQ
If both punch holes, why two machines?
Punch intensity and cut synchronization differ. Continuous press punch with tracking cut is a heavier package than a C225 stretch-hole station with ordinary hydraulic cut.
Is hanging the third option?
Yes. Hanging / hoist-change solves multi-profile frame swap. It is not merely “more punching.”
Can I upgrade a C225 line later to matching GY160 speed?
Not by renaming. Tracking cut, punch power, and installed capacity belong to a different BOM — quote the punched configuration explicitly.
Which thickness language is safe?
Both recommended sheets cite about 1.5–2.0 mm. EN C225 variants may list 1.0–2.0 or 1.2–2.0 — do not lock one interval for all markets.
References
- Technical FAQ labels: PLANK-C225, PLANK-PUNCH
- Industry context: perforated vs embossed plank market choice
- Industry context: scaffold plank punch-form-cut overview
Final ratings follow the named technical proposal. Commercial price and lead time are out of scope.