

A peach-shape mesh fence post line forms a slotted, peach-cross-section column so wire mesh panels insert into the channel. Public peach-post guides describe the same geometry and warn that wall thickness and feed width track the finished post size — they are not universal constants.
| Item | Reference (locked enough to cite) |
|---|---|
| Main motor | ~11 kW |
| Stands / shaft | ~26 stands; shaft ~φ90 (45#) |
| Speed | ~0–8 m/min |
| Drive / cut | Chain drive; flying saw tracking cut; blades Cr12MoV ~HRC58–62 |
| Length tol. | ~3 m ±1.5 mm |
| Frame notes | ~280H frame; side plate ~20 mm; 380 V / 50 Hz / 3 ph (customizable) |
Peach post developed blank width and wall thickness follow the finished peach geometry and mesh-slot depth. Publishing a competitor’s 1.2–2.0 mm band as “our” encyclopedia constant would invent a rating the source proposal has not locked. Keep market bands as industry context only until the contract drawing is fixed.
Main motor (~11 kW), stand count (~26), shaft (~φ90), and speed (~0–8 m/min) can be cited as host references; thickness and strip width cannot until the peach drawing is approved.
No. Use it only as industry context until the proposal locks thickness and width for this tooling.
This reference uses tracking flying saw — not a hydraulic stop shear story.
They are reference host data. Still send the peach drawing and lock thickness / strip width on the proposal.
Only if the drawing matches. Do not borrow thickness or stand counts across post geometries.
Verification page: open thickness/width intentionally. Final ratings follow the confirmed proposal. Price and lead time are out of scope.