

OT60 produces 60-class octagonal tubes for shutter shafts and related tube uses: electric decoil → pneumatic feed → continuous punch → roll form → die hold → flying-saw tracking cut. It is thicker-duty than OT40 and must not inherit OT40 dual-7.5 kW or 60 t press wording as its own baseline.
Recommended baseline is the Chinese OT60 technical-parameter sheet (about 0.8–1.2 mm GI, main about 11 kW, press about 63 t, about 21 stands, shaft about φ70).
Recommended process wording:
Applications. 60-class octagonal tubes for longer / heavier shutter spans and related tube drawings. Not OT40 thin-coil duty; not ERW round/square; not a downpipe line.
| Item | Documented reference |
|---|---|
| Thickness | About 0.8–1.2 mm GI |
| Main / decoiler | About 11 kW / 2.2 kW on ~3 t electric decoiler |
| Press | About 63 t continuous punch |
| Stands / shaft | About 21 horizontal (+ vertical rolls) / φ70 |
| Cut | Flying-saw tracking after form |
| Controls | PLC (brand not locked on that sheet) |
| Hydraulic / saw kW | Not singled out on that sheet — do not invent |
| Item | Source wording |
|---|---|
| Forming speed string | Source lists “0–10 mm/min” — unit is anomalous for a tube line |
| Public action | Do not lock a public m/min from that string; confirm on contract / measured run |
| Same-pack high-speed English | About 10–15 m/min class elsewhere — do not silently merge into OT60 Chinese baseline |
No. Thinner coil, dual 7.5 kW, and 60 t press belong to OT40. OT60 uses thicker GI and about 11 kW / 63 t class.
Do not lock m/min from the anomalous “0–10 mm/min” source string. Confirm speed on the named OT60 proposal or measured run.
Not as standalone figures on the Chinese OT60 sheet — leave blocked rather than inventing values.
Not automatically. Multi-size cassette hosts are a different commercial story; still quote the named size’s duty.
Final ratings follow the confirmed technical proposal. Price and lead time are out of scope.