Table of Contents
- Bottom line
- What evidence supports
- What is not established
- Do not mix these
- How to request a machine proposal
- Buyer FAQ
- References
1. Bottom line
Profile knowledge is not a machine quote. YX51-305-915 sources describe open deck geometry and application notes. Machine-side speed, power, pass count, and auxiliaries are blocked in the available FAQ evidence. Suppliers who build deck mills likewise ask for a profile drawing (or sample) before issuing a tailored quotation — that is the correct next step.
2. What evidence supports today
- Effective coverage about 915 mm
- Wave height about 51 mm; three waves; pitch about 305 mm
- Coil width reference about 1200 mm in profile notes (market pages may cite ~1150 mm unfolded — treat as context, lock on proposal)
- Composite floor / multi-story steel application language
3. What is not established
| Machine field | Status in source FAQ |
|---|
| Forming speed | Blocked — do not invent 8–10 or 8–12 m/min here |
| Main / hydraulic power | Blocked |
| Pass count / shaft | Blocked |
| Thickness rating for the mill | Blocked — do not copy ~0.8–1.2 mm from other deck machine quotes |
| Full line BOM | Blocked |
4. Do not mix these
- Using 609–914 mm effective-width machine figures as if they automatically apply to this open profile reference
- Treating closed-600 (~30 passes, ~2×11 kW) as a default open-915 mill
- Publishing roof sheet parameters as a workaround
5. How to request a machine proposal
- Attach the YX51-305-915 (or equivalent) drawing and thickness/material target.
- State required length range, shear preference, and decoiler capacity needs.
- Ask engineering to return speed, power, passes, and auxiliaries as a single confirmed set.
6. Buyer FAQ
Why won’t you just use the 914 machine numbers?
Because 914 is a different evidence pack (effective-width forming line). Similar coverage is not identity.
Is the profile page useless without machine data?
No — it prevents wrong-family quoting and sets the geometry the mill must hit.
When can public pages list speed for open 915?
Only after a named technical proposal (or equivalent machine evidence) documents it.
Final ratings follow the named technical proposal. Price and lead time are out of scope.