

The main difference between high-speed and low-speed angle bead / net wall angle packages is the press and die package (investment, stroke rate, die sourcing). Forming-host logic is similar on both tiers. Do not invent two unrelated forming-power stories.
Both tiers follow the same product idea: coil → servo feed → press for net punch → level → roll the corner → hydraulic cut → exit. Speed-tier language mostly tracks how aggressive the press/die package is, not a doubled roll-former motor.
| Item | Both tiers (documented) | High-speed example extras |
|---|---|---|
| Forming main | About 3 kW | — |
| Hydraulic | About 3 kW | — |
| Press | Required for net punch | About 40T; press motor about 4 kW; high stroke-rate class — confirm in proposal |
| Die story | Dies per drawing | Higher die cost / sourcing options called out on high-speed docs |
| Drive / controls | Gear drive; PLC class common | Same family — confirm brands on the proposal |
Stroke rate may reach a several-hundred-cycles-per-minute class on high-speed references — finalize on the named proposal; do not publish a single SPM as encyclopedia law.
Thickness is never a single locked public value — the contract drawing rules.
Not in the documented packages — forming stays about 3 kW; press investment and stroke capability rise.
About 40T with press motor about 4 kW on one high-speed reference — confirm stroke rate and die package on the proposal.
Low-speed docs may cover both when tooling allows. Always send drawings; do not assume universal coverage.
No. Angle bead / net wall angle is a perforated corner product with its own press + form route.
Final ratings follow the named press tier proposal. Price and lead time are out of scope.