

A hanging-type (hoist-change) walking-board line uses whole forming frames that lift on/off the base so several plank profiles share one plant (A/B hosts common; C on a separate frame in some packages). Contract English may say “floor decking” while the BOM is hanging plank — keep it as a walking-board plant, not a structural floor-deck line.
RU specifications may add logo / connection-hole tooling and dual hanging segments — confirm drawings. Public multi-profile / quick-change plank articles describe cassette or raft swaps as the buyer problem this package solves: multi-board without living on one fixed C225 roller set.
| Item | CN recommended / RU variant |
|---|---|
| Speed | CN with punch ~8–12 m/min; RU ~5 m/min with punching — do not lock one |
| Power | Forming ~37 kW; hydraulic ~15 kW (accumulator note); RU total ~37 |
| Stands | CN A ~36 / B ~26 rows; RU Updated ~30 each — confirm drawings |
| Shaft / thickness | φ80; 1.5–2 mm Q235 CR/GI |
| Drive / HMI | Gear hanging host; Yaskawa / Kunlun vs Siemens brand variants — contract decides |
Instead of stand-by-stand re-gap on a single fixed roller path, the hanging package lifts a pre-set forming frame. Industry cassette / raft tooling solves the same buyer need — multi-profile change in tens of minutes class — as background. Exact crane method, frame count, and profile list follow the named hanging proposal.
When the project needs A/B/(C) multi-board families and frame swaps matter more than living on one ~225 mm roller set. For a single C225-class board at recommended 5–10 m/min / 22 kW, open the C225 page.
Neither as the only truth. CN with punch is about 8–12 m/min; some RU sheets write about 5 m/min with punching. Name the quotation.
Multi-profile hanging plants often punch head/tail notches (and sometimes logo or connection holes) before the strip enters the hanging former — confirm the hole map on the drawing.
Not when the BOM is hanging-type walking board. Keep plank routing; do not re-file as structural floor deck solely because of the English filename.
Final ratings follow the named hanging proposal. Price and lead time are out of scope.