

In roll-forming plants, fish tail (and related shop slang) usually means end flare: the flanges at a cut end open or close relative to the steady mid-length section after cut-off. English literature most often uses end flare / cut-end deformation. This page treats fish tail and end flare as the same defect family for encyclopedia purposes.
Note: “fishtailing” in some welding/can contexts is a different defect. Here the topic is roll-formed cut-end distortion.
During progressive forming, residual longitudinal and shear stresses build in the flanges. When the continuous profile is cut, those residuals release. Research describes residual longitudinal stresses producing bending moments and residual shear stresses producing torsional moments; their superposition yields the typical end shape change.
Light-gauge channel studies also emphasize reverse bending downstream of roll-center contact as a source of the moments that remain as residual stress until cutting.
Classic U-profile behavior reported in end-flare research:
Shop practice matches this: measure both ends; do not average them into one “flare” number without labeling lead vs trail.
Roll-Kraft and similar technical notes describe designing over-form then under-form then finish so stretch/compress cycles reduce residual flare. Industry prevention lists also include minimizing deformation per pass and using side rolls to guide/control the strip.
More progressive station layouts with lower peak strain gradients have been associated with better end geometry versus aggressive few-station flowers in FEA-backed discussions.
Dedicated flare fixtures / conditioners (two-roll, three-roll, adjustable vertical rolls on open-seam tubes, etc.) can remove substantial flare after or near the exit. Use them as process tools, not as excuses for an untreated flower when flare is extreme on every length.
| Lever | Intent |
|---|---|
| Gentler flower / more stands | Lower residual stress peaks |
| Over/under/finish sequence | Balance residuals before cut |
| Side-roll control | Guide flanges |
| Exit straightener / twist-flare fixture | Final correction band |
| Coil quality | Reduce incoming residual stress variability |
Lead/trail residual moment superposition commonly produces opposite behaviors.
A good die avoids crush, but residual-stress flare remains a forming issue.
Higher residuals and springback often enlarge end errors—design accordingly.
Yes, FEA is widely used; still verify because stand stiffness and coil scatter matter.
Yes—cutouts change local stiffness and residual release paths.
No. Lubrication is not the primary control for residual-stress end flare.
Train shipping to pad flared ends so bundles do not permanently set worse shapes in storage.
For welded frames, end flare that is “in tolerance” for stick length may still fail robotic clamp—agree functional gauges with the customer.
Design reminder: build over/under/finish into the flower early for open channels known to fish-tail.
Quality reminder: define measurement location (e.g. 25 mm from cut) so shifts do not invent different numbers.
End flare changes after each forming step in research observations—late stations matter. Do not assume early-pass fixes alone erase exit residuals.
When pre-punch patterns exist near the future cut, residual release can interact with hole distortion—inspect both geometry and hole position at ends.
If trail flare always exceeds lead close by a large margin, that matches published superposition patterns—use it as a sanity check on measurement orientation.
Defect encyclopedia for SEO/GEO. Fish tail ≈ end flare from residual stress release at cut-off.
Measure lead and trail separately. Cross-read: Springback; Twisting; CAE; Pass Design.
Flower over/under/finish and exit fixtures are the main shop controls.