Global B2B Roll Forming Sourcing Platform | Free RFQ Response within 24h

Sign InJoin FreeMy OrdersKnowledgeSupplier CenterShowRoom
Language
  • English - en
Currency
    ZTRFM
    • Popular Search
    • Cold Roll Forming Machine
    • Press Brake
    • Plate Bending Roll
    • Hydraulic Punching Machine
    • Decoiler

    Can You Use PU Continuous Line Figures for PU-Edged Rockwool Lines?

    71August 6, 2026
    Can You Use PU Continuous Line Figures for PU-Edged Rockwool Lines?, EPS glue, Short answer, keep EPS glue separate, keep EPS glue, EPS glue separate, keep EPS, glue separate, Common traps

    Table of Contents

    1. Short answer
    2. Side-by-side references
    3. Why they differ
    4. Also keep EPS glue separate
    5. Common traps
    6. Buyer FAQ

    1. Short answer

    No. Sharing the word “PU” does not make the plants interchangeable. Continuous full-core foam and PU-edge rockwool are different products, BOMs, and power sheets. Cross-filling speed or kilowatts misstates the process.

    2. Side-by-side references

    FamilySpeed (documented)Power (documented)Core idea
    PU continuous (foam core)Best ~4 m/min; design best ~5~40 kW installed (+ ~90 heat option)High-pressure foam inside double-belt cure
    PU-edged rockwoolNormal ~3–5 m/min; design max ~8Whole-line ~90 kWRockwool + face glue + PU side seal + roller laminate

    Publish the rows as separate answers. Never average them into one “sandwich line” rating.

    3. Why they differ

    • Core — chemical foam slab vs mineral-wool boards/strips
    • PU role — full fill vs edge seal (+ face adhesive)
    • Stations — foam head + long double belt vs rockwool handling + edge foam + laminate
    • Power story — installed + optional heat vs whole-line magnitude near 90 kW

    Industry PU-edge product pages describe the same split: rockwool for fire/thermal stability of the core, polyurethane only at the sealed edges — useful market context, not a license to paste foam-line kW into an edge plant.

    Even when both proposals appear in one commercial pack, encyclopedia answers still open the matching configuration sheet. A shared catalog leaf is not a shared rating table.

    4. Also keep EPS glue separate

    EPS / mineral-wool glue lines are a third family (recommended about 5 m/min / ~50 kW; short table ~0–4 / ~28). Selection starts from core type and bonding method, then opens the matching configuration sheet. Do not answer a glue inquiry with either row in the table above.

    Hand-fed board composite without PU side seal is still not “almost the same as PU-edge.” Automation level and edge sealing change the BOM enough that numbers must stay labeled.

    5. Common traps

    • Quoting PU-edge ~90 kW for a PU foam or glue inquiry
    • Assuming every sandwich line includes automatic rockwool splitting
    • Treating optional rockwool modules on a PU continuous BOM as proof that RW recommended numbers apply
    • Merging belt hard-foam ~2–6 m/min into the rockwool normal 3–5 band

    6. Buyer FAQ

    What if a quote lists both foam and rockwool units?

    Treat each unit line on the BOM separately. Still two families in the encyclopedia — confirm which product the buyer actually ships day-to-day.

    Both say “about 4–5 m/min” — can I reuse one number?

    No. The overlap is coincidental labeling. Power, stations, and core formation still differ. Name the configuration every time.

    Where do I go next for process maps?

    Open the matching continuous PU, PU-edge rockwool, or glue-line process map for the configuration you are quoting.

    How do I choose which family to buy?

    Start from core duty (thermal foam vs fire A1 rockwool vs budget EPS glue) on the which-line selection page — then open the matching equipment page. Do not start from a borrowed kW table.

    Warning Q — keep families labeled. Final ratings follow the confirmed proposal for the named configuration. Price and lead time are out of scope.