

No. Sharing the word “PU” does not make the plants interchangeable. Continuous full-core foam and PU-edge rockwool are different products, BOMs, and power sheets. Cross-filling speed or kilowatts misstates the process.
| Family | Speed (documented) | Power (documented) | Core idea |
|---|---|---|---|
| PU continuous (foam core) | Best ~4 m/min; design best ~5 | ~40 kW installed (+ ~90 heat option) | High-pressure foam inside double-belt cure |
| PU-edged rockwool | Normal ~3–5 m/min; design max ~8 | Whole-line ~90 kW | Rockwool + face glue + PU side seal + roller laminate |
Publish the rows as separate answers. Never average them into one “sandwich line” rating.
Industry PU-edge product pages describe the same split: rockwool for fire/thermal stability of the core, polyurethane only at the sealed edges — useful market context, not a license to paste foam-line kW into an edge plant.
Even when both proposals appear in one commercial pack, encyclopedia answers still open the matching configuration sheet. A shared catalog leaf is not a shared rating table.
EPS / mineral-wool glue lines are a third family (recommended about 5 m/min / ~50 kW; short table ~0–4 / ~28). Selection starts from core type and bonding method, then opens the matching configuration sheet. Do not answer a glue inquiry with either row in the table above.
Hand-fed board composite without PU side seal is still not “almost the same as PU-edge.” Automation level and edge sealing change the BOM enough that numbers must stay labeled.
Treat each unit line on the BOM separately. Still two families in the encyclopedia — confirm which product the buyer actually ships day-to-day.
No. The overlap is coincidental labeling. Power, stations, and core formation still differ. Name the configuration every time.
Open the matching continuous PU, PU-edge rockwool, or glue-line process map for the configuration you are quoting.
Start from core duty (thermal foam vs fire A1 rockwool vs budget EPS glue) on the which-line selection page — then open the matching equipment page. Do not start from a borrowed kW table.
Warning Q — keep families labeled. Final ratings follow the confirmed proposal for the named configuration. Price and lead time are out of scope.