

A belt-type rigid PU foam sandwich line variant is a continuous polyurethane sandwich configuration that cures injected hard foam between dual rubber belts (belt-style conveyors), rather than quoting only the long steel double-belt press family used on another PU continuous reference.
It still forms metal skins, injects reacting polyurethane, and cuts panels to length — but public answers must label this tier as the belt hard-foam variant. Do not average its speed or power with the double-belt continuous PU sheet.
Typical station wording for this variant family:
Applications. Continuous production of rigid polyurethane-core roof and wall insulated sandwich panels where the proposal explicitly selects the belt hard-foam layout. Not an EPS glue composite line; not a PU-edged rockwool continuous line.
| Item | Documented reference |
|---|---|
| Line speed | About 2–6 m/min |
| Roll-press side note | Some docs cite forming-unit maximum about 15 m/min — that is not curing line speed |
| Main power | ≥ about 35 kW (proposal wording) |
| Face / width | Face about 0.35–0.75 mm; effective width about 1000 mm |
| Core thickness tiers | 35 / 50 / 75 / 100 mm — confirm molds and recipe |
| Curing concept | Dual rubber-belt cure for rigid foam |
Industry continuous PU lines also describe double-belt presses in the roughly 16–36 m class with market speeds often advertised around 3–10 m/min. Treat those as background; this page keeps the package belt hard-foam numbers above.
No. Same chemical idea (PU foam between metal skins), different configuration sheet. Label “belt hard-foam” when quoting 2–6 m/min and ≥35 kW.
That figure is a roll-press / forming-unit maximum on some docs. Curing line speed on this variant remains about 2–6 m/min.
Those are named tiers on the belt hard-foam documentation. Final molds, density, and recipe follow the signed proposal.
No. That belongs to the rockwool continuous family. Do not paste whole-line 90 kW onto this belt hard-foam answer.
Final ratings follow the named belt hard-foam proposal. Price and lead time are out of scope.