

Marketing language may say simply “828 glazed tile.” In practice there is a main 828 configuration and an 828 Variant B configuration that share the same feed/formed width pair but use different roll geometry. They are not interchangeable without a roll-set change.
| Item | Both configurations |
|---|---|
| Thickness | About 0.3–0.8 mm |
| Feed → formed | About 1000 → 828 mm |
| Pitch | About 207 mm |
| Forming / working speed | About 8–12 / 3–5.5 m/min |
| Shaft | φ70 mm |
| Main / hydraulic | About 3 kW / 5.5 kW |
| Item | 828 main | 828 Variant B |
|---|---|---|
| Peak / crown height | About 30 mm | About 25 mm |
| Forming stations | About 11 passes | About 13 passes |
| Roll set | Main 828 tooling | Separate Variant B tooling |
Same covering width does not mean the same tile drawing. Peak height and pass count differences are enough to require dedicated rolls.
Under the 828 width family, arc and trapezoid-named variants are also split as separate configurations. Example: 828 arc lists peak about 30 mm with about 11 passes; an 828 trapezoid-named variant lists peak about 25 mm with about 13 passes and a different hydraulic figure on its own sheet. Always name the exact sibling on the inquiry.
No. Variant B uses more stands and a lower peak than the main 828 reference.
On the documented main vs B pair, main and hydraulic sit in the same about 3 / 5.5 kW class — the tooling difference is the critical split.
Both use about 1000 mm feed into about 828 mm cover. Coil purchasing is similar; rolls are not.
Final ratings follow the confirmed proposal for the named 828 sibling. Price and lead time are out of scope.